The just path of upward mobility

In Detroit and surrounding 11 southeastern Michigan counties, less than 80 percent of students graduated from high school. Nearly half of Detroit High School graduates who go to college fail to graduate in six years.

Nationally, only 53 percent of all young people go to college and only 60 percent of them have a degree.

We have a society that does relatively little for those who are not on the college track. The message to these young people is similar to Bert Simpson’s joke: “You can’t win. Don’t try. “

We live in a time of anxiety, when it is easy to assume that solutions to social and educational problems are beyond our knowledge and ability. In fact, we have learned a great deal about how we can tackle educational and employment inequalities and lead many more young people to a brighter future.

We can do better. We need to do better.

It is no secret that the key to success for the underdeveloped population in high-demand industries and professions. This requires a versatile approach that incorporates each of the following components.

  • Establish a guided course that leads to a career.
  • Replace non-credit remedial courses with co-requisite remedies, with the help of companion courses and tutors and other support specialists.
  • The institute offers skills-based curricula, active and experiential pedagogy, and authentic assessments that are strongly aligned with career outcomes.
  • Replace math paths aligned with specific curriculum and career goals for traditional math course sequences.
  • Provide overall student support, including academic and career counseling, teaching, transportation, and basic needs support, and access to emergency assistance.
  • Offer industry-recognized certificates that can stack up in degrees.
  • Apply technology-enabled advice to monitor student progress and request pro-active intervention when students are off-track.
  • Arrange for uninterrupted transfers and credit disclosures for those who wish to transfer to another institution.
  • Involved with relocation organizations and employers.
  • Conduct rigorous evaluation.

If the answer to the challenge is already known, why haven’t we had more success? The main obstacle is the ignorance of the administrators? Defective institutional culture? Bureaucratic inertia? Money? Implementation challenges?

Indeed, one of the biggest hurdles among many potential registrants is the realization that programs are less likely to lead to success. Schools are already closed, all potential beneficiaries are convinced that the cost and demands of the programs are extremely steep, and that life is much more likely to go toward the end of the program.

These are completely reasonable concerns.

Many young people look around and see failed workforce training programs with bad results. It is not surprising that many doubt that a new approach has the potential to succeed.

So, what is the solution?

1. Create career awareness
In high school or earlier, introduce potential participants to wage and employment estimates and clearly identify the skills required for a particular profession.

2. Refuse to consider non-degree or professional pathways as inferior to degree pathways.
An old belief in the dignity of all forms of labor has faded, replaced by the tendency to divide the working class into winners and losers. We have to pay for all kinds of work and some work to prevent this assumption less or less important.

3. Reduce financial constraints
If the cost of the opportunity is too high then free is not enough. Coverage of at least some living expenses is essential.

4. Get started early
Potential beneficiaries are more likely to participate in these programs if they start before making big promises in life.

5. Sell the program to those who say they have “no time for training.”
In light of the other needs of the individual’s time, we need to make many more understand that advanced training will truly pay off: additional training is not irrelevant or a waste of time, but rather the key to progress and upward mobility.

6. Create on-ramp and off-ramp
Since not all potential participants are interested in entering these programs early, promote multiple entry points that can accommodate complex life.

7. Expand earn-learn options
Work with employers to combine on-the-job training of their employees.

8. Make sure the paths lead to real career success
This requires industry input, programs that emphasize career-linked knowledge and skills, and intensive monitoring of post-graduation employment and earnings results.

9. Create programs that document students’ workplace skills.
To address the “experience gap”, programs are designed that show that students have acquired the skills that employers are looking for.

10. Create employment guarantees
Employers are confident in areas with high employment demand to guarantee post-employment.

If we want to build a more just, inclusive, and equitable society, we must do much more to extend the path to economic success beyond traditional college degrees. Of course, there is a danger that non-degree options could exacerbate inequality, trap recipients in low-paying, end-to-end jobs, and further encourage companies to abandon in-house training. Which, of course, is why the value of such programs should be carefully assessed and why such programs should be stackable to a degree.

A new book by Paul L. Gaston and Michelle Van Noy, Certificate: Understand problems, identify opportunities, create solutionsExamines the expanded universe of non-degree certification options that promise to open the door to opportunity.

As the authors note, the ecosystem of certification is a chaotic mess, with many confusing options, very few reliable guidelines, and many programs with dubious employment results. Without a well-defined, industry-aligned curriculum, strong advice, effective pedagogy, wrapping support structure, valid and reliable performance and efficiency assessment, and assurance of quality and integrity, such programs are “hui”.

So what can I learn from Gaston and Van Nyre’s books?

1. Community colleges, in particular, must recognize that non-degree certificates and trainees can play a significant role in improving employers’ employment and earning potential, but only if the program’s results are completely transparent and the programs themselves complement a strong, guideline, support. , And evaluation wrapping systems.

2. Quality programs must combine a structured curriculum, evidence-based pedagogy, hands-on practical application, intensive counseling, accurate assessment, and post-completion support.

3. Institutions should be highly strategic where they offer non-degree certification programs, limiting them to programs that closely align with first generation students and disadvantaged students and industry needs and with a proven track record of success, employment placement, and Additional Certificate Access.

Success should not be without a single path. By privileging college degrees, we have, intrinsically and systematically, invested less in other avenues that would benefit the least privileged, most disadvantaged students. It’s unreasonable.

In his 1965 introductory speech at Howard University, President Lyndon Johnson declared:

“So just opening the door to opportunity is not enough. All our citizens must have the ability to walk through that gate.

“It simply came to our notice then. We don’t just want freedom, we want opportunity. We want human rights, not just legal justice, equality just as rights and theories, equality as a reality and consequently equality. “

It is time to expand the door of opportunity.

Steven Mintz is a professor of history at the University of Texas at Austin.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.