Americans nowadays agree on a few things, but they agree: the country is embroiled in a cultural war. The symptoms are not hard to find. Justice Samuel Alito’s draft Supreme Court ruling overturns Rowe v. Wade’s assertion of a cultural warrior who wants to hold a certain ideology of “deeply rooted in the history and heritage of the nation.” Populist governors call war speeches because they style themselves as guardians of the sanctity of family and the safety of children. In Florida, it wasn’t enough for Governor Descent to panic about sorting out gay children; When criticized, he attacked “grown executives” from California hiding behind Mickey Mouse. Abbott, a Texas authoritarian, is concerned about being sidelined by more extreme statistics on the right, and so he brutally promotes solidarity through targeted cruelty, repeating medically sanctioned care for sex-incompatible children as child abuse.
“Culture War” is a fitting name for this type of base sacrifice goat এবং and much more. When online groups target an individual or organization for some inappropriate use of language — we are told it is a “culture war.” The silence of the most talked about speakers and the self-censorship of loud mourning on campus (and everywhere) ওthis is also called “culture war.” School board meetings are becoming more and more popular, with some trying to make the election of those boards even more biased. Conservative parties have argued that they are making the biased reality of local elections more visible. On the left, Jameel Bui advises, “The culture war is here, whether the Democrats like it or not. The only way to deal with it is to lose it. “
Politicians (and now almost everyone, including social media accounts) know the benefits of portraying oneself as a defender of a way of life (a culture) by pointing to an enemy that can arouse fear and disgust. Those People are not only different from our common people; They threaten our lives. If the warriors of culture can convince people that they really care about at-risk children, they have a particularly strong case for building solidarity based on hostility towards others. This is not new. Sigmund Freud sarcastically writes, referring to the need for someone “outside” to express the aggression of those who preach communal love, “in this case the Jewish people have provided the most useful services to the civilizations of the scattered countries that they had.” Unfortunately, not all the genocide of the Jews in the Middle Ages was enough to make that time more peaceful and secure for their Christian comrades. ” Freud’s observations (made between the two world wars) are worth remembering today.
We often see schools and universities as a place where complex warfare can be investigated and debated without deteriorating, but the terms “culture war” are associated with higher education. The phrase originated in the late 1980s as concerns about campus political correctness continued to explode. Campuses were often a haven for outsiders, but in the early 1990’s, critics complained that colleges had become a breeding ground for sectarianism and discipline. For the past 30 years, culture warriors have made higher education a major place for their war. Recently, state governments have responded by attacking tenure and threatening to return the money. The Public University Governing Board, meanwhile, has become more politically polarized.
How should colleges and universities in the United States respond? Faced with a culture war, they should practice Culture is peace Protects their mission and their weakest members. The missions of higher education institutions differ in subtle ways, but they all require broad freedom of inquiry and expression. This means that politically unpopular views should be thoughtfully explored by students and teachers, and that conversations and debates should be ensured in a “sufficiently safe place” – an environment where everyone is protected from harassment and intimidation but where no one is offended. No. Or they may have changed their mind. The place of freedom of inquiry is the place of experimentation — and this means that people will often change their mind, discover that they are wrong. In such a place, forgiveness and mutual understanding are as important as the courage to speak, at least when exploring new ideas and methods.
In times of intense cultural conflict, the practice of higher education for cultural peace must include a commitment to protect the most vulnerable members of its community. At a time when the investigation of racism and its history is again a thorny issue in the political arena, concern for vulnerability means defending faculty and student research so that aspects of our current situation are built on principles and practices that are unfair and morally contradictory. Sacrificing isolated and gender-sensitive people, practicing the peace of culture means a campus is a place where they can thrive. In many colleges, conservative and religious students feel marginalized, and the responsibility of the institution is not only to protect them from harm but also to ensure that they too can take full advantage of educational opportunities. These include on-campus discussions about what intellectual diversity means in a particular context এবং and support for programs that are meant to bring serious perspectives to these discussions that may not be popular with most students and teachers.
Some will advise academics to stay away from the path of conflict around them করতে to fight for a neutrality that enables them to rise above the politics of our time. Others may find it foolish or idealistic to call on universities to practice cultural peace when they are frequently attacked in this cultural war. But to be true to our academic and civic mission, we must be practical idealists, where we can establish peace through open inquiry and the promotion of free expression. We must protect those who want to take part in this effort from the threat of violence or polarization while building respect for intellectual diversity. By practicing the peace of culture, we will be more open to discovery, including the discovery that it is time to change our minds and listen more attentively to others. It is not easy to practice cultural peace in times of civil war, but it is the antidote to our today’s conflict.